String Check: USTA National Clay Courts 12s

Last entry I discussed the rackets that some of the best 12 and under tennis players in the United States used at the USTA National Clay Courts. But as my friend Tom Parry of Pacific has often said, “rackets are just string holders.” So what types of strings did we see? Through the first three days, it looked like this:

All Multifilament –23.5%

All Synthetic Gut –12.0%

HYBRID –35.3%

All Monofilament –29.0%

These string combinations are listed from “hardest” to “softest” in terms of the feel of the string and the amount of shock that is transmitted to the players arm. (Operationally, the United States Racquet Stringers Association defines the “stiffness” of a string as the pounds of force per inch necessary to move the string. This ranges from the softest gut at 88 to the stiffest Kevlar at over 500. Most multifilaments are in the 180-200 range, synthetic guts are in the 200-220 range, and monofilaments range from 220 to over 300.)

The stiffness of the player’s stringbed is a big concern. I know many people who have developed wrist or elbow tendonitis from using strings that are too stiff. I worry about the long term consequences on a kid’s arm of using very stiff strings from a very young age. I advise my customers – regardless of age actually — to use the softest string possible, and only move to harder strings when they begin to break strings more frequently than they can afford.

I was happy to see, therefore, that less than a third of the players were using all monofilament string jobs and slightly more than half were using all multifilament or all synthetic gut strings. The largest group of players were using hybrid strings (stiffer monofilament strings on the mains and softer strings on the crosses), which is a good compromise for people who play and break strings frequently.

Interestingly, one of the tournament sponsors, Babolat, gave each player a free pack of RPM Blast 17g. That is 128 sets in total, which is quite generous. I am not certain, however, that it is a good idea for 10, 11, and 12 year olds to be using all-RPMs. I often hear people characterize RPM as a “soft poly.” It is actually a very stiff sting (rated at 280 pounds). What people react to, I believe, is that it is more elastic than other earlier generation monofilament strings, giving it better “feel.” But the fact that it has more elasticity doesn’t mean that it won’t transmit a good deal of shock to the arm of a 11 year old kid. I just strung a Babolat Pure Drive with RPM at 62# and wonder about the long term effect of that on the player’s physical well-being. He did complain about shoulder pain after one of his matches and said (joking perhaps, though perhaps not) that he was going to drop 10# on his rackets after the tournament.

Speaking of tensions, almost one-quarter (23.5%) of all of the players we strung for were at 59# or higher, though some of those were stringing with all multifilament strings. The same proportion were stringing at 54# or lower, which I think is a good ceiling for most players (sting low!). No player strung below 50#, though. The majority of players strung between 55# and 58#, with the single most popular tension being 55#. In general, I found the string tensions reasonable in combination with the types of strings people were using.

In the end, I would say the “typical” racket being used by the players at this tournament was a Wilson with hybrid string job at 55#.

The most unique request was for a 9 year old player using a Wilson K-Blade junior model. The mother dropped off the racket and said she didn’t know the tension range, so I was going to string it at the middle of the range with a Gamma multifilament. She came back a moment later and said the kid’s coach texted her the tensions for the racket: 51.5# on the mains, and 50.5# on the crosses!


Bag Check: USTA National Clay Court 12s

What rackets, strings, and tensions are some of the best 12 and under tennis players in the United States using? Stringing at the USTA National Clay Courts 12s at Hanes Park has given me some insights. Through 3 days of stringing, here is what we saw in terms of rackets. (More on strings and string tensions in the coming days.)

The most commonly used racket brands at this tournament are:

Babolat –32.3% of players stringing with us

Wilson –32.3%

Head –17.6%

Prince –6.0%

Tecnifibre – 6.0%

Yonex –6.0%

Brands not seen in the stringing room include Dunlop, Volkl, Donnay, Solinco, and Pacific.

Most popular racket models are the Babolat AeroPro Drive (including the lighter “Team” version), Wilson BLX 6.1, and the Head YouTek Speed. This is not at all surprising as these are the models endorsed by Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, and Novak Djokovic, respectively.

The millions in endorsement dollars paid by these racket companies translate rather directly into racket choices by junior players. Of course, junior sponsorships help, and to be sure Babolat, Wilson, and Head are among the most liberal in doling out free and reduced price equipment. But many (most?) of the kids playing at this tournament could get full or partial sponsorship from any of these companies, so their choices are instructive.

One of the most interesting developments I notice in the decades since I was a junior tennis player is the decline of Prince among competitive juniors. Only 6% of players we strung rackets for used Prince. In the 1980s, if memory serves correctly, all of the cool kids played Prince. Now it seems to be more of a racket for recreational players and country clubbers.

I was happy to see a few players using Tecnifibre and Yonex, both of which make fine equipment. Compared to the Babolats and Wilsons of the tennis world, I suppose both of these companies must be content to be niche players. At 6% of the market each at this tournament, that may be right where they want to be.

Cory Parr Pro Transition Blog, Entry #1: Pro Transition Camp

Hi, everyone. This is the first time I’ve ever done a blog, and honestly it is a bit embarrassing for me to do this because I don’t ever really like calling alot of attention to myself. It seems cocky, but hopefully I can say some things that people will find interesting about becoming a professional tennis player.

I just got back from spending last weekend in Boca Raton, FL at USTA National Training Center for the USTA’s Pro Transition Camp. I got invited to do this as part of the USTA Summer College team. There were 12 guys down there, all really good players, along with our coaches Chris Brandi (from Wake Forest) and Tony Bresky (from Virginia). You can see a picture of us all below.

This is the first time the USTA has held one of these camps, and I was impressed at how much thought the coaches had put into what we were doing that weekend. Every aspect of the drills, the play, the workouts, and the meetings was completely thought out ahead of time. The four days we were there we got so much done because of that.

Jay Berger, USTA National Coach for Men’s Tennis, headed the camp, and he had a very clear vision for what he wanted to accomplish. Berger had spent some time on the practice court with Rafael Nadal at the French Open this year and his vision for the camp seemed to come from that. He told us how hard Nadal practices, hitting for an hour and half all out with only two short breaks. Players like Nadal have revolutionized tennis in terms of being physically demanding. You have to work hard because the game has gotten extremely physical. People are beasts out there. I will always remember what Berger told us: If you work your hardest and do everything right, you work hard every day, training and lifting and hitting, you MAY make it (no guarantees!). But if you don’t put the work in every day, you have no chance.
Because we were so busy everything is kind of a blur, but our days basically were to wake up and eat, then do a couple of hours of fitness in the early morning followed by fed and tossed ball drills for a couple of hours. Alot of us hadn’t done any tossed ball drills for a long time. That’s like what you see when kids are just learning to play. Even though it seems basic, this showed that having a strong foundation is vital when every small bit can be the difference between winning and losing. Everybody on tour seems like they have pretty good strokes, so a little bit better footwork or a little bit better fitness can make a big difference in the end.
After a day or so we started playing more live ball drills and sets where we had to do specific things like play the first two balls cross-court or only hit second serves. This really showed me the importance of practicing with a purpose, trying to do specific things, and recreating playing situations in practice, rather than just banging balls for a long time.
On the first day of training, Connor Pollock (from Texas A&M), Bradley Klahn (from Stanford), and I had the bad luck of getting put on Jay Berger’s court. He worked us harder than anyone the whole weekend. It couldn’t get harder than that.
Berger was helped on court by Hugo Armando and Leo Azevedo. Both are South American clay court specialists, that I think are part of Jose Higueres’s team. You probably know that the USTA has hired Higueres to help American players learn how to play better on clay, and to take the lessons from that and use them on other surfaces, too.
I will never forget the head fitness guy, Satoshi Ochi. A little Japanese guy (on the far left in the picture above) who ran the crap out of us every day. Not so much running sprints but doing tennis specific footwork drills that were burning, just absolutely killing our legs.
Off the court I roomed with Connor Pollock, which was cool. I knew he from juniors and we also had alot in common because he also just graduated from college. We stayed at a Hilton hotel near the facility, which would have been nice if we weren’t so tired every day when we got back there. I crashed out around 9pm most nights.

That’s all I have for now. I’m getting ready to fly to Rochester for a Futures event next week. I’ll write about that when I get a chance.